78. So Unexpected A Book

Reminder: If you’re reading this in your email, you have to go to dpauthor.com and click on the Speaking of Which tab in order to view the actual blog post with the featured image.


Hi All –

Allow me to introduce Jeffrey Evan Brooks and his new book, So Unexpected A Moment: A Novel of the Revolutionary War, which yours truly had the pleasure of assisting with in terms of reviewing and commenting on the manuscript. To be sure, I found its narrative to be at variance with my interpretive understanding on certain points, but, hey, it IS a novel and I enjoyed the read very much—so much so that I asked Jeff if he would agree to be interviewed for one of my blog posts. He has graciously consented to do so.

Jeff, tell us about your background and how and why you came to write this book.
I am a lifelong student and teacher of history. As a boy, I devoured every history book I could lay my hands on. My parents took me on wonderful road trips, visiting historical sites all across the country. Now that I’m an adult, I buy far too many history books to ever read. And my chosen vocation (I wouldn’t call it a “job”) is to teach American history to 8th graders. History is my life.
As to why I came to write this particular book, I have always found the story of the “Ten Crucial Days” irresistible. It’s simply so full of drama and great characters, with the fate of the nation hanging in the balance. It’s a historical event crying out to be turned into a good historical-fiction novel.

Give us a quick summary of the book’s contents.
The novel is a retelling of the Ten Crucial Days—the Delaware River crossing, the first Battle of Trenton, the critical decisions made by both sides immediately afterwards, the much-neglected Battle of Assunpink Creek (or second Trenton), and finally the Battle of Princeton. Everyone has seen the famous Leutze painting of the Delaware crossing, of course, but as I like to tell my students, the true story is infinitely richer and more dramatic than its depiction in art. There is no need to dramatize it, but what really happened is a more vivid and astonishing story than anything imagined by the best fictional novelist.
But it’s not just a dramatic military tale. The Revolutionary period was a time of new questions about human freedom. If America was going to be an independent nation, what kind of nation was it going to be? So as the protagonists struggle through their various adventures, they find themselves debating with themselves and with one another exactly what the war is really about.

How did the experience of writing this book compare with your previous book, which is an alternate history novel of the Civil War?
The first third of my first novel, Shattered Nation, was genuine historical fiction. It was only with the “point of divergence” that it became alternate history. This book, on the other hand, is straight-up historical fiction. So I did not have the freedom to imagine events unfolding in my own way. I thought this would make the novel easier to write, but I found it was actually much more difficult. I had to do much more intensive research.
And as far as primary source material, the Revolutionary War is not as rich a time period as the Civil War era.

What was most challenging for you in crafting this novel?
As with any historical fiction, there is the problem of accuracy. The needs of the novelist are different from the needs of the nonfiction writer. Sometimes, telling the story with perfect historical accuracy might actually leave the reader more confused than they otherwise would have been. I wanted to tell the true story of the Ten Crucial Days, but not to get so bogged down in details as to leave the reader frustrated and confused. So certain things have gone unmentioned or been simplified, but only in cases so minor as not to make any real difference.
Almost everything depicted is, as nearly as possible as we can determine, what really happened, or at least what could have happened. The adventures of John Mott are largely conjectural, as I needed a vantage point for the reader to see certain events, such as Edward’s Hand’s brilliant delaying action on January 2, 1777. The only point in the novel where I really allowed my imagination to run wild was the story of how Robert Morris obtained the money needed by Washington on December 30, 1776 to pay a bonus to those soldiers who agreed to remain with the army when their enlistments expired, but that story is so steeped in legend that I felt it a worthwhile indulgence.
I decided earlier on that, while the story obviously revolves around Washington, I was not going to use him as a perspective character. I’m not so arrogant as to think I could get inside that man’s head. So it was a challenge to write a novel in which the reader never sees the events through the eyes of the most important person.

What sources of information proved most helpful to you in your research?
The most fun I had doing research for the book was using the free and easily accessible Founders Online, the National Archives’ online database of the writings of Washington and others. Reading the letters and official orders issued by Washington during this period, some of which are included verbatim in the novel, is simply thrilling.
Of the numerous books written about the crossing of the Delaware and the battles at Trenton and Princeton, by far the best is Washington’s Crossing by David Hackett Fischer. It’s a stupendous feat of historical writing and fully deserved its Pulitzer Prize. Another very useful source was The Winter Soldiers by the late, great Richard M. Ketchum. I read a number of biographies, including those of Nathanael Greene, Benjamin Rush, Henry Knox, Charles Cornwallis, and others.
And, of course, your wonderful books were a great help to me, especially your book on John Haslet. [Note to the reader: Let the record reflect that no bribery was involved here—at least none that can be proven.]

Did writing this book change your perception of the events or people about whom you wrote and, if so, how?
I felt I already knew a lot about these events when I started to write the novel. But as I wrote, I found myself more and more in awe of these amazing men and what they went through during those ten days. Needless to say, our nation was not created by soft people. It makes me wonder if today’s Americans would have what it takes to match the feats of the founding generation.
At the same time, I found myself admiring the British characters, who were not the cardboard cutout villains Americans sometimes imagine (as, for example, in Mel Gibson’s movie “The Patriot”). General Cornwallis and Lieutenant Colonel Charles Mawhood were great and honorable men, fighting for what they thought was right. And they had a sense of decorum and dignity that has almost entirely vanished in our time and which we would do well to try to restore.

What would you most like readers to take away from reading the book?
This book is an expression of my gratitude and appreciation for the people who created this country. We take our freedoms for granted, so much so that I have 8th graders express astonishment that there are people in the world who don’t have freedom of speech, freedom of religion, the right to vote, the right to a fair trial, and all the rest. We too easily forget that those who came before us struggled and suffered, and many gave their lives, to win those freedoms for us. David McCullough once commented that not bothering to learn about the founding generation is a form of ingratitude and that ingratitude is a shabby personal quality. I entirely agree.

Do you have another writing project in mind?
I am thinking of writing a novel about Operation Dragoon, the little-known invasion of southern France during World War II.

Thanks, Jeff. Good luck with the new book and your next undertaking.

And if readers want to check out your Amazon page, they can do so here.


BTW, in case anyone is wondering, the official release date for my new book, Winning the Ten Crucial Days, is April 15, although signed copies are currently available in the gift shop at Washington Crossing Historic Park.

 

Odds & Ends

Reminder: If you’re reading this in your email, you have to go to dpauthor.com and click on the Speaking of Which tab in order to view the actual blog post with the featured image.


Hello All,

I wanted to use this blog post to facilitate access to information about a potpourri of sources and events that may be of interest to some of you  .  .  .

— Dennis P. Ryan’s 1975 booklet, New Jersey During the American Revolution, A Chronology – 1763 to 1783 (now out of print) can be downloaded from the NJ State Library page at this link.

— A series of twenty-eight New Jersey’s Revolutionary Experience pamphlets (also out-of-print), which were published by the New Jersey Historical Commission to commemorate the Bicentennial of the Revolution, can be viewed at this link.

— In keeping with the observance of Black History Month, February 11, 2025 was designated 1st Rhode Island Regiment/Black Regiment Day pursuant to resolutions adopted by the Rhode Island Senate and House of Representatives to commemorate the contribution of Black soldiers during the Revolutionary War.

— For Central Jersey history aficionados or fans of Founding Father John Hart of Hopewell (c.1713-1779), an article by Patrick H. Ryan, Tracing the Central Jersey Roots of John Hart, Signer of the Declaration of Independence, appeared in the free email newsletter from TAPinto Princeton on February 14.

— Washington Crossing State Park (NJ) is undergoing a dramatic transformation that will include the opening of a new visitor center next year, as described here.

An Evening with Rick Atkinson, to be held at Washington Crossing Historic Park (PA), on June 10 from 7 to 9 pm, will feature a discussion by the Pulitzer Prize-winning author of his new book, The Fate of the Day—the second volume in his Revolution trilogy—and the signing of books purchased in connection with this event.

— Finally, I’m scheduled to talk about two of my books and sign copies per below:

  • The Battle of Harlem Heights, 1776, at a Lecture & Book Signing sponsored by the Lehigh Valley Heritage Museum, 432 W. Walnut St., Allentown, PA, on March 29 at 1 pm; and
  • my new book, Winning the Ten Crucial Days, at Living History Day: Celebrating America’s Independence sponsored by Washington Crossing Historic Park, on July 4, in the Visitor Center auditorium—with an initial presentation at 2 pm and an encore at 4 pm. (Please note: the entire Independence Day event is from 12:30 to 4 pm.) This begs the question whether giving two talks in one day about the Ten Crucial Days will reduce me to a tense, crucial daze.

There you have it. Hope you enjoy (or endure, as the case may be) the final days of winter.

76. A Founding-Focused Foundation

Reminder: If you’re reading this in your email, you have to go to dpauthor.com and click on the Speaking of Which tab in order to view the actual blog post with the featured image.


Say that three times fast!

No, but seriously, I don’t know how many of you are familiar with the work of the Swan Historical Foundation, Inc. (SHF), so let me suggest that this is as good a time as any—what with the impending semiquincentennial (250th anniversary) of American independence in 2026—to recognize its efforts at promoting awareness and understanding of our Revolutionary heritage.

This nonprofit is dedicated to encouraging and inspiring continuing knowledge and appreciation of the Revolution for the benefit of present and future generations. It’s named for an early member of the U.S. House of Representatives, Dr. Samuel Swan, of Somerville, NJ, who sponsored legislation that provided a pension for the widows and orphans of the first American soldiers and led to the creation of the federal Veterans Administration. His great, great grandson, H. Kels Swan—a lifelong resident of South Bound Brook, NJ, a Rutgers University alumnus, and an author who served as historian and curator at Washington Crossing State Park, Titusville, NJ (Hopewell Township)—founded SHF in 1989 and became its president.

​A proud partner and sponsor of RevolutionNJ, SHF is working closely with the State of New Jersey to build a new visitor center that is rising on the banks of the Delaware River at Washington Crossing State Park. Most of the artifacts in the SHF collection of 1,200 original items from the Revolutionary era (1750-1810), which are currently displayed in the old visitor center, have been on loan to the park for a number of years. The old center is slated for demolition, but a new iteration of the imposing SHF exhibit will greet visitors to the state-of-the-art facility that opens next year. (Additional items in the collection are currently on loan to other institutions or in storage.)

Besides the care, interpretation, and expansion of its breathtaking collection​, what else has SHF been up to?

Well, in 2002, it commissioned artwork by a noted local artist, Loyd Garrison, which conveys what is believed to be an accurate image of Washington’s legendary Christmas night 1776 crossing by ferry boat. More recently, SHF participated in  a 13-minute video, Crossing To Victory: Washington Recaptures New Jersey, which was made possible by a joint effort of the Mercer County Cultural and Heritage Commission, NJ Historical Commission, Mercer County Board of County Commissioners, NJM Insurance Group, and several generous individuals. The film examines some of the lesser-known events and sites at Washington Crossing State Park so critical to the success of that momentous event and the subsequent march to Trenton and victory over the Hessian garrison there.

But there’s a lot more to the story. The vital educational role embraced by SHF is illustrated by the wide range of activities in which it has engaged over the past generation:

  • Supporting organizations with a common interest in the Revolution;
  • ​Participating in historical fairs, meetings, and conferences;
  • Giving talks and lectures to community, historical, and patriotic groups;
  • Providing financial support for historical programs in partnership with Washington Crossing State Park;
  • Loaning artifacts from its collection to other museums;
  • Offering periodic exhibits at various locations in PA and NJ;
  • Providing access for third parties to photograph artifacts in its collection for books, articles, and various publications;
  • Funding an annual short-term residential research fellowship with the David Center for the American Revolution at the library and museum of the American Philosophical Society in Philadelphia for scholars in all fields to work in the artifact collections of SHF, the American Philosophical Society, and other repositories in the greater Philadelphia area;
  • Organizing living history talks and demonstrations;
  • Distributing a newsletter that features articles about the Revolution and profiles of items in the SHF collection;
  • Sponsoring the Washington Crossing American Revolution Round Table; and
  • Conducting tabletop demonstrations of Revolutionary War battles.

Rev War aficionados need to appreciate the work SHF is doing to establish a firm (ahem) foundation for the celebration of our founding. Obviously, it has many partners in this enterprise, but SHF is one of those truly unsung heroes in the upcoming national project that is dedicated to commemorating our historical legacy and reminding us once again that America is more than just a place, but an idea as well.

As John Adams famously observed, “The Revolution was in the minds and hearts of the people.” May it always be so.


Attention Rev War Buffs:

Mark your calendar!

THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, a new six-part, 12-hour documentary series from acclaimed filmmaker Ken Burns—focusing on the country’s founding and the War for Independence—will launch on Sunday, November 16 and run for six consecutive nights through Friday, November 21. It will air from 8 to 10 p.m. ET on PBS.

I Ken hardly wait.

James Kirby Martin (1943-2024)

James Kirby Martin, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus of History at the University of Houston, passed away on New Year’s Eve. I had limited exposure to the man—he coedited my book about the Battle of Harlem Heights with Mark Lender for the Westholme Small Battles Series and was kind enough to review my forthcoming work, Winning the Ten Crucial Days—but he impressed me as someone whose gentlemanly manner well complemented his admired scholarly standing as a student of early American history. The author of fourteen books, Jim was a professor at Rutgers for many years before relocating to Texas, as well as having taught at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point and The Citadel. For those who are interested, you can find more information about him on his website.

I wanted to remember him here by offering the following excerpt from the preface to his 2019 volume, Insurrection: The American Revolution and Its Meaning (originally published as In the Course of Human Events: An Interpretive Exploration of the American Revolution in 1979), which is, for my money, perhaps as good an introduction to its subject as one is likely to find—a lucid, concise narrative that is comprehensive in scope and insightful in its interpretation:

The late novelist L. P. Hartley once compared the act of learning about past times to visiting foreign nations with customs, values, and ideals different from our own. Hartley’s observation is well taken. Probing deeply into earlier eras requires a commitment to keeping peoples and events in their actual historical context rather than engaging in present-minded critiques of their values and ideals, as if our own beliefs and actions are universally above reproach. In this volume I have worked to stay in context. My purpose has been to describe and explain rather than pass along critical judgments about Revolutionary era persons who did not subscribe to the same set of social and economic values that we hold dear today. If one is looking for present-minded historical judgments, they are readily available these days. Certainly, both leaders and followers in the Revolutionary generation had their blind spots. However, we need to remember that no generation has ever reached perfection in its accomplishments and that some persons during the Revolutionary era put forth a noteworthy effort in seeking to establish a better world for posterity.

Thank you, Jim. RIP.

 

Book Signing

Reminder: If you’re reading this in your email, you have to go to dpauthor.com and click on the Speaking of Which tab in order to view the actual blog post with the featured image.


For anyone who’s interested and expects to be in the area, I’ll be signing copies of my books at Washington Crossing Historic Park (PA) on December 25 (from 12 to 3 pm) during the 72nd annual reenactment of the Continental Army’s Christmas night 1776 crossing of the Delaware River.

The first crossing reenactment on December 8 did not occur because of low water levels due to the summer drought, although more than 3,000 people were present to enjoy the other activities. Based on the amount of recent rainfall, it would appear that the replica Durham boats WILL (probably) be able to do their thing on the 25th. More information is available here.


FYI, I will be giving guided tours at WCHP on the 21st and 28th, after which I expect to be absent from the park until at least March. Things slow down during the winter months, and so fewer staff are scheduled to work there.

Best wishes to all for a healthy and happy 2025!

 

 

Miscellany

Hello All –

This isn’t so much a blog post as an update on current activity that may be of interest to some subscribers.

I’ve had to postpone several in-person events and curtail my customary appearances at Washington Crossing Historic Park (WCHP) due to what I assume, i.e., hope will be a short-term physical issue, while trying to do a limited amount of face-to-face engagement and find opportunities to pound the keyboard.

Two recent blog posts on this site have morphed into articles for other platforms:

Defining Victory in the Revolution has insinuated itself into the WCHP blog.

Albigence Waldo: Surgeon, Soldier, Diarist, Poet appeared in the Journal of the American Revolution this week.

I’m looking forward to giving the inaugural guided tour of the 2024 season for the Princeton Battlefield Society on May 19 from 1—2:30 pm. More information and registration are available here.

As part of Hopewell Valley Heritage Week 2024, I’m scheduled to speak on May 21 at the First Presbyterian Church of Titusville, 48 River Drive, Titusville, NJ 08560 (Hopewell Township). This event is cosponsored by the Washington Crossing Park Association of New Jersey and the D & R Greenway Land Trust. The talk, which will be the first (and hopefully not the last) based on my forthcoming book, is entitled: “Winning the Ten Crucial Days: A Thematic Interpretation.” In addition, Dr. Richard Veit, a registered professional archeologist and professor of anthropology at Monmouth University, will discuss his findings in regard to the site where over 10,000 Continental troops encamped in Hopewell from June 23 to 25, 1778, prior to the Battle of Monmouth. The event runs from 7—8:30 pm. More information is available here.

Best to all.

 

 

69. Where was Waldo?

Reminder: If you’re reading this in your email, you have to go to dpauthor.com and click on the Speaking of Which tab in order to view the actual blog post with the featured image.


Why was Albigence Waldo Important?

In general historiographic terms, Waldo is best known for having kept a diary during the winter of 1777-78 that recorded his experience and that of his fellow Continental soldiers during the storied Valley Forge encampment. The diary provides a graphic firsthand account of the challenges faced by the army that winter. Waldo’s commentary is regarded as an especially valuable resource for studying this period, during which the young physician attended to many an ill soldier. His entries were recorded in The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography more than a century later based on a manuscript furnished by Amos Perry of the Rhode Island Historical Society.

Who Was He?

Born in February 1750, in Pomfret, Connecticut, Waldo received his early education there and studied medicine under the guidance of Dr. John Spaulding in neighboring Canterbury. Afterwards, he settled in his native town, where he took the place of Dr. John Hall, who had moved to Vermont. Waldo married Lydia Hurlburt in 1772, and they would have four sons and three daughters.

When the Revolutionary War began, the Pomfret physician left his family and medical practice to join the cause. Waldo initially served as a clerk in a militia company from Woodstock, Connecticut, but In July 1775, he was commissioned surgeon’s mate of the 8th Connecticut Regiment under Col. Jedediah Huntington, only to be discharged that September because of ill health. In December 1776, the Connecticut Committee of War commissioned him chief surgeon of the armed ship Oliver Cromwell, but he was induced to leave that vessel by an invitation from Col. Huntington to join his newly raised 1st Connecticut Regiment as surgeon. In early 1777, Waldo joined the regiment, which was assigned to the brigade led by Brig. Gen. Huntington (having been promoted from colonel) in Maj. Gen. Alexander McDougall’s division of Connecticut and Rhode Island troops.

Raised largely in New London County, the 1st Connecticut took the field in the spring of 1777 at Peekskill, New York, and was ordered by Washington to join the main army in Pennsylvania in September after the battle of Brandywine Creek. At Germantown on October 4, the regiment was engaged at the front of Maj. Gen. Nathanael Greene’s division. As winter settled in, Waldo recorded the experience of army life in a series of day-by-day chronicles that vividly convey his thoughts and feelings.

The army surgeon resigned his commission in October 1779 and resumed his medical practice in Pomfret, where he became an accomplished surgeon whose entire practice was devoted to that specialty. His first wife died in 1785; and two years later, he married Lucy Cargill, who survived him until 1830 (they would have two daughters). Dr. Waldo died in January 1794 and is buried in Pomfret.

Waldo’s Words

The Connecticut surgeon’s diary entries are thoughtful, lively, engaging, and in many cases quite caustic—understandably so given the prevailing circumstances. His observations reflect a determination to cope with the challenging circumstances facing him and his army brethren, a frustration with a lack of appreciation for the troops’ plight among the civilian population, an enduring love of family, a deep admiration for Washington and his fellow soldiers in general, and a recognition of the long-standing mistreatment accorded Indians by the colonists.

A Sample of Waldo’s Writing

December 15, 1777 — Mankind are never truly thankfull for the Benefits of life, until they have experience’d the want of them. The Man who has seen misery knows best how to enjoy good. He who is always at ease & has enough of the Blessings of common life is an Impotent Judge of the feelings of the unfortunate.

December 21 (after the army’s arrival at Valley Forge on the 18th) — Preparations made for hutts. Provisions Scarce … sent a Letter to my Wife. Heartily wish myself at home, my Skin & eyes are almost spoil’d with continual smoke. A general cry thro’ the Camp this Evening among the Soldiers, “No Meat! No Meat!”-the Distant vales Echo’d back the melancholly sound-“No Meat! No Meat!” Immitating the noise of Crows & Owls, also, made a part of the confused Musick. What have you for your Dinners Boys? “Nothing but Fire Cake & Water, Sir.”

December 24 — Hutts go on Slowly-Cold & Smoke make us fret. But mankind are always fretting, even if they have more than their proportion of the Blessings of Life. We are never Easy, allways repining at the Providence of an Allwise & Benevolent Being, Blaming Our Country or faulting our Friends. But I don’t know of anything that vexes a man’s Soul more than hot smoke continually blowing into his Eyes, & when he attempts to avoid it, is met by a cold and piercing Wind.

December 26 — Many Country Gentlemen in the interior parts of the States who get wrong information of the Affairs & state of our Camp, are very much Surprized at G Washington’s delay to drive off the Enemy, being falsely inform’d that his Army consists of double the Number of the Enemy’s-such wrong information serves not to keep up the spirit of the People, as they must be by and by undeceiv’d to their no small disappointment;-it brings blame on his Excellency, who is deserving of the greatest encomiums; it brings disgrace on the Continental Troops, who have never evidenced the least backwardness in doing their duty, but on the contrary, have cheerfully endur’d a long and very fatigueing Campaign.

January 1, 1778 — New Year.—I am alive. Hutts go on briskly, and our Camp begins to appear like a spacious City….
Nothing tends to the establishment of the firmest Friendship like Mutual Sufferings which produces mutual Intentions and endeavours for mutual Relief which in such cases are equally shar’d with pleasure and satisfaction-in the course of this, each heart is laid open to full view-the similar passions in each, approximate themselves by a certain impulsive sympathy, which terminates in lasting esteem.

January 4 — I was called to relieve a Soldier tho’t to be dying-he expir’d before I reach’d the Hutt. He was an Indian-an excellent Soldier-and an obedient good natur’d fellow. He engaged for money doubtless as others do;-but he has serv’d his country faithfully-he has fought for those very people who disinherited his forefathers-having finished his pilgrimage, he was discharged from the War of Life & Death. His memory ought to be respected, more than those rich ones who supply the world with nothing better than Money and Vice.

January 6 — If I should happen to lose this little Journal, any fool may laugh that finds it,-since I know that there is nothing in it but the natural flowings & reflections of my own heart, which is human as well as other Peoples-and if there is a great deal of folly in it— there is no intended Ill nature-and am sure there is much Sincerity, especially when I mention my family, whom I cannot help saying and am not asham’d to say that I Love….
We have got our Hutts to be very comfortable, and feel ourselves happy in them—I only want my family and I should be as happy here as anywhere, except in the Article of food,
which is sometimes pretty scanty.

January 8 — Unexpectedly got a Furlow [furlough]. Set out fur home. The very worst of Riding-Mud & Mire.

The diary ends here.


P.S. For anyone who may be interested, Brookline Books is accepting preorders HERE for my upcoming book, Winning the Ten Crucial Days: The Keys to Victory in Washington’s Legendary Winter Campaign.

67. Whither the Republic?

Reminder: If you’re reading this in your email, you have to go to dpauthor.com and click on the Speaking of Which tab in order to view the actual blog post with the featured image.


A 72-page pamphlet by Moses Mather (1719-1806), entitled “America’s Appeal to the Impartial World,” which mounted a vigorous defense of American rights against Great Britain, was published in the spring of 1775 by Ebenezer Watson in Hartford, CT, and advertised for sale in the April 3 edition of Watson’s paper, The Connecticut Courant. Mather, a native of Lyme, CT and a Yale College graduate, was ordained a Congregational minister in 1744. The pastor of the Congregational church in Darien, he later became an outspoken revolutionary and was imprisoned in 1779 and 1781 by British raiding parties from New York. After the war, he received a divinity degree from the College of New Jersey (today’s Princeton University) and continued his ministerial duties in Darien until his death.

In reading the above pamphlet, it struck me that one of his observations has particular relevance for this generation. Without seeking to make a partisan point (which would be at variance with the intent and purpose of this platform), I wanted to share the following, which I believe is especially deserving of our consideration:

Mather references the assertion of an anonymous “celebrated French writer, treating of the English, and the excellence of their constitution … that England could never lose its freedom, until parliament lost its virtue.”[1] It seems to me that we can contemporaneously echo that claim in regard to the status of American democracy going forward. We can never lose our freedom unless our government loses its virtue.

That point was essentially made by no less a luminary than the nation’s 16th president. On January 27, 1838, a youthful Abraham Lincoln, then a member of the Illinois General Assembly speaking before the Young Men’s Lyceum of Springfield, opined as follows regarding any hypothetical threat to the republic:

At what point shall we expect the approach of danger? By what means shall we fortify against it? Shall we expect some transatlantic military giant, to step the Ocean, and crush us at a blow? Never! All the armies of Europe, Asia and Africa combined, with all the treasure of the earth (our own excepted) in their military chest; with a Bonaparte for a commander, could not by force, take a drink from the Ohio, or make a track on the Blue Ridge, in a trial of a thousand years.

At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, if it ever reach[es] us, it must spring up amongst us. It cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by suicide.[2]

He and his generation would be forced to grapple with just such a challenge a little over two decades later.


Notes:

[1] Gordon S. Wood, ed. The American Revolution: Writings from the Pamphlet Debate, 1773-1776. vol. 2 (New York: The Library of America, 2015), 598-599.

[2] Mario M. Cuomo and Harold Holzer, eds. Lincoln on Democracy (New York: A Cornelia & Michael Bessie Book, 1990), 16.

64. How Conclusive are your Conclusions?

Reminder: If you’re reading this in your email, you have to click on the link at the bottom or go to dpauthor.com and click on the Speaking of Which tab in order to view the actual blog post with the featured image.


Hope everyone enjoyed Thanksgiving. I know I’ve neglected this blog of late, due in part to other literary exertions, but felt compelled to scribble something that bears on what I’ve been doing and will hopefully satisfy an urge to be at least minimally conscientious about posting stuff. (I will not make a new year’s resolution to do better on this score because experience suggests—actually screams—that it would guarantee nonperformance.)

Anyway, what triggered this latest post is something from Al Frazza’s book, State of Revolution: My Seven-and-a-Half-Year Journey Through Revolutionary War New Jersey, Al, who created RevolutioaryWarNewJersey.com, provides a useful reminder to maintain humility in the context of historical interpretation—and other pursuits too, for that matter. In other words, it’s a good idea to know what you don’t know (so to speak). I’ve tried to keep that in mind when writing and doing my tour-guide thing at Washington Crossing and Princeton, but it never hurts to give the memory banks a nudge on that every so often.

So here’s the relevant excerpt:

…one should always stay humble about what one is researching. Always consider that, no matter how much you know, it is only a small part of the larger story, and that other people know things that you don’t. Even when it comes to the things that you know very well, it is good to be open to the possibility that you may be incorrect in your conclusions. It can keep you from finding a deeper truth if you are too confident in your assumptions.

And speaking of assumptions, one that I never made relates to an early holiday gift for yours truly that just arrived from the Journal of the American Revolution (JAR). I never know what’s going to (as they say at the Washington Crossing parks) really float the editors’ boat, but today I learned that one of my articles from earlier this year—Eutaw Springs and the Ambiguity of Victory—has been selected for inclusion in the next annual hardcover book produced by JAR, scheduled for release in April. These hardcover volumes feature the best (as determined by the editors) historical research and writing published by the journal during the prior calendar year—typically between thirty and forty articles (forty in the 2024 volume). They are available from Westholme Publishing, Amazon, or wherever books are sold. (Since 2021, I’ve written nine articles for JAR and three have made the cut for the annual volume. Boy, if only I could have hit .333 playing softball at Glen Ridge High.)

I hope to be able to share encouraging news on the next book very soon—but I don’t want to sound too, well, confident in that assumption.

In the meantime, I hope you all have a great holiday season and extend my best wishes for a healthy and happy new year!


If any of you will be attending the annual Princeton battle reenactment on January 7, I’ll be manning the “general store”for the Princeton Battled Society that day, i.e., selling stuff, along with my wife Alison. (I mean to say she’ll be helping me, not that I’ll be selling her.) So stop by and say hello. I’ll also be helping out at the Delaware River crossing reenactments at Washington Crossing Historic Park on December 10 and Christmas Day, so the same goes for them. (No, I will not be in a boat; I get seasick in a bathtub.)

Upcoming Talk

Hi all —

For anyone who’s interested, I’ll be giving a Zoom talk about my most recent book, The Battle of Harlem Heights, 1776, through the Fort Ticonderoga Author Series on Sunday, January 14 (2 – 3 p.m.). The link to register is here. Please note: admission is free for Fort Ticonderoga members, and there is a $10 fee for the general public. Most of my speaking events are limited to members of the hosting organization, so you might say this is the exception to the rule.

Best regards,

dp